A product of Altamont Digital

The work stays when people leave

One home for people, programmes, evidence, and close-out. Ubu drafts the next step. You tap Accept.

Ubu — you be you. Drop a TOR, a field note, or a receipt. Ubu does the plumbing. Partners, not data points. The organisation keeps the files — not the consultant’s laptop.

Already licensed? ·

Altamont Digital

Who wins when programmes run on IMP

  1. Community member in the field

    01

    Beneficiaries & communities

    Consent-safe services. Faster course-correction when the data is in one place.

  2. Leadership reviewing a governed pack

    02

    Funders & institutions

    A trail they can audit. Packs they can take to the board.

  3. Programme team in the field

    03

    Implementers

    One workspace after close-out — not a consultant laptop.

  4. Evaluation working session

    04

    Evaluators

    Answers to the TOR, after a human Accept.

Team reviewing results on IMP
Four audiences IMP looks after: beneficiaries, funders, implementers, evaluators.

Built for rigorous reporting

MinistriesINGOsUN programmesEvaluators

Two-minute brief

Capacity that remains.

Four paths. One home. Clear answers when you need them — for the people who run the work, and the people who buy it.

Click to play · sound on

The same four problems, every programme

  • People leave, files leave

    When a consultant or staff member goes, the spreadsheets and field notes often go with them.

  • Evidence is scattered

    Consent, interviews, and numbers sit on laptops and private drives — not in one place the organisation owns.

  • Tools are a trap

    Either a messy consumer app, or a heavy system that needs a specialist just to stay running.

  • Close-out is a scramble

    The board pack is assembled by hand at the end. Nobody is sure what was accepted, or what is still a draft.

Four jobs. One login.

People

Who you serve, who said yes, who is enrolled — partners, not rows on a spreadsheet.

On track?

What you promised, what actually happened, what you learned. Numbers a funder can read.

Answers

Open an Evaluation programme. The MERL desk is the walk. Ubu drafts. You Accept.

Money

Claims, trips, bills — tied to the work, so audit is a download, not a reconstruction.

Ubu does the plumbing — reads the receipt, flags the gap, drafts the pack. You Accept. Nothing publishes as truth on its own.

Ubu is you be you. Hit Ubu, drop the work, fly. Listen first, draft the work, never take the yes.

Ready when someone asks to see the trail.

  • Your org, your files

    Each organisation is its own workspace. People records and consent never leak to another team.

  • Hours you do not spend formatting

    Ubu flags missing files before the deadline. Packs come from live records — you argue the finding, not the folder.

  • A trail that is already there

    Who changed what, who consented, who Accepted. Survive a review without rebuilding the story from email.

OECD-DAC

Evaluation criteria you already report against

Relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability — held next to the evidence and findings, not rebuilt in a consultant slide deck.

USAID & multilateral

A trail that survives a compliance review

Activity and indicator actuals, consent, and financial claims sit in one organisational record. When a mission or inspector asks for the chain of evidence, it is already organised.

What stays when the project ends

  • Faster donor cycles

    Convert field data into compliant reports in days instead of weeks.

  • Stronger re-award position

    Prove outcomes with a trail donor agencies can actually follow.

  • Zero consultant lock-in

    Onboard new staff or a new firm on your historical data layer — not theirs.

Own the files. Keep the impact.

Twenty minutes on one live programme — not a slide tour.

No obligation. Scope designed in days — not another opaque proposal cycle.